Review points for Understanding and Techniques

The Understanding and Techniques documents have all the edits in place
that are on my radar. I would like for us to approve publication this
week, so you should review these documents before Thursday.

Once again, the URLs are:

    * http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2010/WD-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20100923/
    * http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2010/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20100923/

You can look at anything you like for your review, but here are a few
points I'd particularly like the group's attention on:

    * Technique F39
      <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2010/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20100923/F39> was
      substantially updated.
    * Technique H93
      <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2010/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20100923/H93> is new.
    * Technique H94
      <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2010/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20100923/H94> is new.
    * Technique FLASH37 removed and content merged into FLASH15
      <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2010/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20100923/FLASH15>.
    * I've added styling to example images in techniques, so they are
      now centered and have an "outset" border. The technique that
      triggered this was G175
      <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2010/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20100923/G175>
      though it affects around 15 or 20 techniques. I'm no designer so
      want to know if this looks ok as I implemented, or concrete
      suggestions otherwise.
    * In the first paragraph of the intro to sufficient and advisory
      techniques
      <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2010/WD-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20100923/intro.html#introduction-layers-techs-head>
      I added excerpts from the Understanding, but without the links you
      would expect because they were examples, not content people should
      necessarily follow in that context. Want to make sure that's ok
      and that the paragraph reads ok. This was for issue 2834
      <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=2834>.
    * Edited description for G164
      <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2010/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20100923/G164> but
      wasn't sure if that was the intended edit for issue 2711
      <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=2711>.
    * I previously sent a question about a random todo
      <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2010JulSep/0060.html>
      from Ben.
    * I previously sent a question that I don't know what the intended
      edit is
      <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2010JulSep/0061.html>
      for issue 2761.

The recent changes are mostly reflected in the issues found at the
following query URL:

http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/buglist.cgi?chfieldto=2010-09-27&chfieldfrom=2010-09-20

You can look through those bugs if you want to check my work more
thoroughly. Also, the diff markup in the documents includes all changes
(except super-minor editorial things like typo fixes) made in the last
year and a half.

If you have edits that need to be made, please send them my way ASAP, I
can't receive a whole bunch of edits late and be able to publish in a
timely manner. Also for this review, changes should focus on perfecting
edits that we already have committed to do, largely in response to
public comments we've processed. New improvements, please hold off, we
can process them after we get this next public version posted.

Michael
-- 

Michael Cooper
Web Accessibility Specialist
World Wide Web Consortium, Web Accessibility Initiative
E-mail cooper@w3.org <mailto:cooper@w3.org>
Information Page <http://www.w3.org/People/cooper/>