- From: Jim Thatcher <jim@jimthatcher.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 09:29:22 -0600
- To: "'Guide Lines list'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <001c01c5f9b0$aef96f30$6501a8c0@jtcom2400>
Here is how I interpret WCAG 1.0 Checkpoint 12.1 in the light of WCAG 2.0: The best implementation of WCAG Checkpoint 12.1 is to use the title attributes on the <frame> tag in the <frameset> page. SC 2.4.4 would require that each frame page have a <title> element which is also a very good technique. Since the <frame> element is a programmatic reference to that delivery unit, SC 2.4.5 would require associated text describing the destination and the title attribute takes care of that. Assuming my interpretations are correct, my question/concern is this. I thank an HTML page can include programmatic references to delivery units in scripts where associating text would make no sense whatsoever. Is 2.4.5 too broad? Should 2.4.5 refer to "perceivable programmatic references" (yuk)? Jim Accessibility Consulting: http://jimthatcher.com/ 512-306-0931 2.4.5. Each programmatic reference to another delivery unit or to another location in the same delivery unit, is associated with text describing the destination. [Level 2.]
Received on Monday, 5 December 2005 15:29:47 UTC