- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lguarino@adobe.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 12:41:43 -0800
- To: "Ben Caldwell" <caldwell@trace.wisc.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Should we add Jim's example to the common failures for this success criterion? Loretta Guarino Reid lguarino@adobe.com Adobe Systems, Acrobat Engineering > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ben Caldwell > Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 12:19 PM > To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > Subject: Re: Navigational features > > > I don't think a class name on a non-heading element is > enough to meet > this SC with our definition of programmatically determined > because there > aren't any user agents (or assistive technologies) that > are able to > identify an element with a randomly selected class name as > a heading (or > any other type of structure). > > So, in Jim's example, my feeling is that these items > should be marked as > headings in order to meet the SC. > > -Ben > > Jim Thatcher wrote: > > We are getting nowhere. I will try once more. > > > > I believe that if all the heading text on a page has the > same class, then > > the headings can be programmatically determined. But the > fact that they are > > headings cannot be programmatically determined. > > > > If folks disagree - fine. But if some agree, maybe 1.3.1 > needs to be > > revisited. > > > > Jim > > > > Accessibility Consulting: http://jimthatcher.com/ > > 512-306-0931 > > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 2 December 2005 20:41:21 UTC