- From: David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>
- Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 23:25:32 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 11:13:25PM +0100, Gez Lemon wrote: > Good point, but one I can live with. The validator could even take > Opera's approach, but instead of pretending to be the most dominant > browser, masquerade as the most standards compliant at any given time. So it still wouldn't support Flash, and it would still not get the invalid code. So the tool would report "After processing JavaScript your document was valid" and mislead the user. -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.uk
Received on Tuesday, 9 August 2005 22:25:39 UTC