- From: Doyle-Work <dburnett@sesa.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:36:22 -0900
- To: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, 'David MacDonald' <befree@magma.ca>, W3C Web Content <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BE3B9FD6.4DFF%dburnett@sesa.org>
Hello All - I actually like what David came up with but have put some words around his original to see if itıll work for all concerned. One thing, itıs not the information that is required but rather the ³actual² forms, fields or other entry mechanisms that are required. Users need to know in advance what is required of them for successful input completion. David wrote: ³Information that is required for the successful completion of the interaction is clearly identified.² I propose the following: ³Forms, fields or other user input mechanisms that are required for the successful completion of the interaction are clearly identified.² Does this get to Greggıs issue and still convey what we want to say? And, I agree this is something everyone needs but I think itıs helpful just th esame. Doyle Doyle Burnett Education and Training Specialist Multiple Disabilities Program Special Education Service Agency dburnett@sesa.org Www.sesa.org -- On 2/18/05 12:41 PM, "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu> wrote: > I think that wording is too general. If I was filling out a form then it > would have to list every piece of paper or record as well as knowledge that I > needed. > > > > Can you restrict this to forms? And fields? > > > > Also also this looks like something everyone would need. Not just people > with disabilities. Am I missing something? > > > > > Gregg > > -- ------------------------------ > Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. > Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. > Director - Trace R & D Center > University of Wisconsin-Madison > > >> >> >> >> >> From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf >> Of David MacDonald >> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 11:51 AM >> To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org >> Subject: Possible added SC to 2.5 >> >> I have been working on General Techniques for Guideline 2.5. >> >> >> >> I recommend that we add a SC to this guideline perhaps as SC level 2 item 4, >> that says something like. >> >> >> >> ³Information that is required for the successful completion of the >> interaction is clearly identified.² >> >> >> >> -------- >> >> Iım speaking about a line at the top of a document that says something like: >> >> >> >> required fields are marked with an * >> >> >> >> or >> >> >> >> required fields are marked with ³(required)² >> >> >> >> David MacDonald >> >> >> >> >> >> ŠAccess empowers peopleŠ >> >> ŠBarriers disable themŠ. >> >> >> >> www.eramp.com <http://www.eramp.com/> >
Received on Friday, 18 February 2005 22:40:51 UTC