Re: 4.1 latest version

Hi Avi!

At level 3:

"2. A controlled language is used"


"controlled language", IMHO, must be explained well... what you wanna say
with "controlled language" ?



----- Original Message -----
From: "Avi Arditti" <aardit@voa.gov>
To: "W3c-Wai-Gl@W3.Org (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Cc: "Maurizio Boscarol" <maurizio@usabile.it>; "Lisa Seeman"
<seeman@netvision.net.il>
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 8:39 PM
Subject: Re: 4.1 latest version



Oops, forgot to note that the "length and complexity of sentences" item
at the Minimum Level now includes Maurizio's guidance on the need to
vary sentence lengths.

Avi Arditti wrote:
>
> Updates to reflect suggestions thus far: now refers to "cohesion" of
> paragraphs in Minimum Level, adds "coherence of pronouns" as an item at
> Level 2, and moves "summaries" to Level 2)
>
> ---
>
> This checkpoint lists ideas to help you review content for clarity. Many
> of these ideas are promoted within the global movement for plain
> language. The items below are not presented as success criteria,
> however, nor as any attempt to impose a particular editorial style.
> Rather, they are elements to consider as you review writing. They
> reflect the idea that accessibility begins with understanding.
>
> You meet Checkpoint 4.1 at the Minimum Level if you review the content
> with items such as these in mind:
>
> 1) Familiarity of terms and language structure
> 2) Length and complexity of sentences (guides to clear writing advise
> writers to vary sentence lengths within a document, but to keep
> sentences short where possible and limited to one idea)
> 3) Cohesiveness of paragraphs (paragraphs that are limited to a single
> idea and a reasonable length are generally easier to understand)
> 4) Clarity of headings and linked text when read out of context.
> 5) Accuracy and uniqueness of page titles
>
> You meet Checkpoint 4.1 at Level 2 if you review the content with items
> such as these in mind:
>
> 1) Use of sentence structures that increase understanding (such as
> active voice in those languages where it is considered desirable for
> conveying information)
> 2) Length of noun phrases (strings of no more than three or four nouns
> are easiest to understand)
> 3) Coherence of pronouns
> 4) Complexity of verb tenses (simpler tenses are easier to understand)
> 5) Intelligibility of verb phrases
> 6) Familiarity of idioms or slang
> 7) Logic in the order and flow of information
> 8) Consequences of ambiguity or abstraction
> 9) Desirability of vertical lists in place of long paragraphs of
> information
> 10) Use of summaries to aid understanding.
> 11) Thoroughness in the explanation of instructions or required actions
> 12) Consistency in the use of names and labels
> 13) Clarity where the document:
> -  addresses users
> - explains choices and options
> - labels options to get more information
> - instructs how to modify selections in critical functions (such as how
> to delete an item from a shopping cart)
> 14) Usage of:
> - proper markup to highlight key information
> - goal-action structure for menu prompts
> - default settings (and the ease in re-establishing them)
> - two-step "select and confirm" processes to reduce accidental
> - selections for critical functions
> - calculation assistance to reduce the need to calculate
>
> You meet Checkpoint 4.1 at Level 3 if at least one of the following is
> true:
>
> 1. New material is tested with potential users for ease of
> accessibility
> 2. A controlled language is used
> 3. Support is given for conversion into symbolic languages

Received on Thursday, 30 January 2003 14:47:59 UTC