- From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 20:34:07 +0100
- To: "Lee Roberts" <leeroberts@roserockdesign.com>, "'WCAG List'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Lee Roberts" <leeroberts@roserockdesign.com> To: "'Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG'" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>; "'WCAG List'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 10:19 PM Subject: RE: Conformance Claims and Logo Third-party software that creates an interface, of course, should follow the rules for accessible API's, but as Roberto points out this may not be available. Definitely, we should require a link to an accessible version prior to reaching the inaccessible version. I'd hate to see someone click on a link to an application that is not accessible only to find out they can't even get to the accessible version because the accessible version link is buried at the bottom of the page where they can't reach it. Roberto: This was my worry :) I think that *when we will discuss this point* we must to create a claim that involve 3rd party to make accessible their products for grant to their customers the conformance ;-)
Received on Thursday, 30 January 2003 14:34:26 UTC