- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 10:14:56 -0600
- To: "'Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG'" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
- Message-id: <005801c2c7b1$90dda9a0$ac17a8c0@TOSHIBATABLET>
Hmmmm How to say this .... There is inaccessible CSS but there is not accessible CSS. That is, CSS isn't a means to convey content but a tool that would be used with a content technology. There could be CSS items that would be used with HTML for example. Then you could have an HTML techniques doc and an HTML + CSS techniques doc. But you couldn't have a CSS doc by itself. There would be no way to describe how to meet all the guidelines. And if our techniques docs are to contain our checklists -- then we have to address all the success critieria. I think it would be very dangerous to start having checklists where you can check all the checkboxes and still not address all the Level 1 issues. It will lead to a lot of false positive assessments. So lets think about a CSS techniques source file (that can be used to build an "HTML with CSS Techniques" doc. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison Gregg: ISSUE #5 This seems to imply that there will be an HTML techniques doc and a CSS techniques doc. Since the checklists are derived from (and contained in) techniques docs, this would imply that there is a CSS techniques doc with checklist items in it - but not checklist items for all of the success criteria (at each or any level) . I don't believe we can have a CSS checklist (and therefore should not have a CSS techniques doc). CSS is part of HTML just like GIF, and JPEG etc. It should not be thought of as separate since you cannot make it accessible. Roberto: i don't agree with this... CSS is a different W3C Raccomandation and is possible to have css that are not accessible and CSS that are accessible. For ex, this code: h1 { font-family: Georgia, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; color: #000; text-align: center; background-color: #fff; } h2 { font-family: Georgia, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 0.8em; font-weight: bold; color: #000; text-align: center; background-color: #fff; } "h1" is not accessible because the font size is fixed in pixel instead to "h2" that has the font size in %. I could agree to insert in HTML guidelines if you think only about in-code CSS but we need to make a specific checklist for CSS.
Received on Wednesday, 29 January 2003 11:15:21 UTC