- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 10:14:56 -0600
- To: "'Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG'" <rscano@iwa-italy.org>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
- Message-id: <005801c2c7b1$90dda9a0$ac17a8c0@TOSHIBATABLET>
Hmmmm
How to say this ....
There is inaccessible CSS but there is not accessible CSS. That is, CSS
isn't a means to convey content but a tool that would be used with a content
technology.
There could be CSS items that would be used with HTML for example. Then
you could have an HTML techniques doc and an HTML + CSS techniques doc.
But you couldn't have a CSS doc by itself. There would be no way to
describe how to meet all the guidelines.
And if our techniques docs are to contain our checklists -- then we have to
address all the success critieria. I think it would be very dangerous to
start having checklists where you can check all the checkboxes and still not
address all the Level 1 issues. It will lead to a lot of false positive
assessments.
So lets think about a CSS techniques source file (that can be used to build
an "HTML with CSS Techniques" doc.
Gregg
-- ------------------------------
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D.
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Gregg:
ISSUE #5
This seems to imply that there will be an HTML techniques doc and a CSS
techniques doc. Since the checklists are derived from (and contained in)
techniques docs, this would imply that there is a CSS techniques doc with
checklist items in it - but not checklist items for all of the success
criteria (at each or any level) . I don't believe we can have a CSS
checklist (and therefore should not have a CSS techniques doc). CSS is part
of HTML just like GIF, and JPEG etc. It should not be thought of as separate
since you cannot make it accessible.
Roberto:
i don't agree with this...
CSS is a different W3C Raccomandation and is possible to have css that are
not accessible and CSS that are accessible. For ex, this code:
h1 {
font-family: Georgia, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-size: 16px;
font-weight: bold;
color: #000;
text-align: center;
background-color: #fff;
}
h2 {
font-family: Georgia, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-size: 0.8em;
font-weight: bold;
color: #000;
text-align: center;
background-color: #fff;
}
"h1" is not accessible because the font size is fixed in pixel instead to
"h2" that has the font size in %. I could agree to insert in HTML guidelines
if you think only about in-code CSS but we need to make a specific checklist
for CSS.
Received on Wednesday, 29 January 2003 11:15:21 UTC