- From: Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG <rscano@iwa-italy.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 21:31:16 +0100
- To: "Michael Cooper" <michaelc@watchfire.com>, "Web Content Guidelines" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Cooper" <michaelc@watchfire.com> To: "Web Content Guidelines" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 5:25 PM Subject: [TECH] Requirements for Techniques v0.3 > Attached is version 0.3 of the Techniques requirements. I apologize that I > did not complete this before the holidays, but you know, things get busy. > This version incorporates comments received to date (unless I've lost track > of any) and adds a little more structure. Hi, here are my suggestion: Intended users: --------------- As said by John, is important to add in the "intended users" the "Trainer developers". Testability: ------------ There are a contrast in these two paragraphs: "Techniques related to Success Criteria must be testable. Guidance about testing methods may be provided. " and this: "Example implementations should be provided for untestable Techniques where possible." I think that we could correct all these with one sentence: "Guidance about testing methods for Techniques related to Success Criteria or example implementations for untestable Techniques related to Success Criteria must be provided." these are my two cents :) Roberto Scano IWA/HWG EMEA Coordinator W3C Advisory Committee Representative for IWA/HWG International Webmasters Association / HTML Writers Guild http://www.iwanet.org - http://www.hwg.org E-Mail: emea@iwanet.org - w3c-rep@iwanet.org --------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 2 January 2003 15:31:24 UTC