- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 04:08:59 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Lisa Seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il>
- cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Lisa Seeman wrote: > >My two cents worth, > >I like seperating them. Yes there is overlap, but the seperation brings >clarity. >There are two disitict tasks that need to be done, and they may overlap >somtimes, but even when the stucturing of a document does not make it more >readabnle for cognitive disabilties - it still needs to be done, for >distinc and important resons. [snip] >I think 3.1 will stand a better chance if it goes it alone. Agreed. These are related in the same way that all checkpoints are related, but they are different in terms of implementation. They also serve different (albeit overlapping) audiences. So it makes no sense to me that they be combined - this is a bit like combining textual equivalents and direct accessibility of interactive content. cheers Chaals
Received on Monday, 26 August 2002 04:09:01 UTC