- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <GV@TRACE.WISC.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 11:20:07 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Hi Jonathan, Interesting. Do you have some specific wording suggestions to consider? Gregg ------------------------------------ Gregg Vanderheiden Ph.D. Ind Engr - Biomed - Trace, Univ of Wis gv@trace.wisc.edu > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf > Of jonathan chetwynd > Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 3:15 AM > To: Charles McCathieNevile > Cc: Chris O'Kennon; ''Lee Roberts ' '; ''w3c-wai-gl@w3.org ' ' > Subject: Re: 4.1 > > > Unfortunately I still feel that whilst we are in agreement on some > aspects of a verbal or textual exposition of what is required, very > little effort is being put into equivalence. Theatre, music, poetry and > oratory have a very ancient heritage, one the web is not finding easy to > emulate. > > When a piece of text produces a coherent audio output, that is > wonderful. however we are a long way from producing multi-media > equivalence, mechanically. Until that remote time, this means both > creating dramatic, pictorial, photographic and or symbolic > representations of complex concepts; and identifying where possible > generalizations that can be incorporated into guidelines*. > > It is essential that at this early stage we extract what is do-able. > There is no sense in defining this as the task though. > > However, it is also necessary to plot a route to the far more remote, > and this is what I feel has been avoided over the past 4 years. > Part of this plotting, requires dead-reckoning, being prepared to fail, > and attempting the apparently impossible, ie in the case of w3/wai a > graphical representation of some aspects of the guidelines. > Fortunately, if the ecmascript techniques document is developed, this > will almost certainly produce some graphical examples. > > It also seems to me that the whole of Guideline 4.-Comprehension leaves > far too much responsibility in the hands of authors. > Users are in a far better position to qualify acceptibility, and should > be involved in the process. if members of a family enjoy the online > family album, surely that is a better guide than the authors+w3 > guidelines. We only can try our best but users ultimately are our guide, > and this needs to be made explicit. > > thanks > > jonathan > > I do have to say that as usual, I have not spent as much time as I would > like actually studying the available reources at w3c/wai > > > *Merely stating that some people prefer one format is not that helpful. >
Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2002 12:21:01 UTC