- From: Charles F. Munat <chas@munat.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 17:30:44 -0700
- To: "WAI Guidelines WG" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Paul Bohman wrote: > [Your comments] can also be condescending at > times, which can be a bit tiring to read. Apologies to anyone who finds me condescending. I'm not, but that doesn't always come across well (either on line or in person). I can't possibly condescend because I see everyone on this list as at least an equal. Most of the time, I feel rather overmatched. But my argumentative style, honed as it was by adolescent struggles with an aggressive and articulate father, does turn some people off. I'll be happy if I just get something positive done. > Your warnings are good, if melodramatic. One man's melodrama is another man's understatement. > [C Munat] The point of any experiment is to test a hypothesis. . . > > [Paul] Kynn's analysis was not an experiment. It was a > statistical analysis. > Nothing more or less. I would say it was considerably less. But then I already did. > > [C Munat] The real question, as I mentioned previously, is ARE THERE SOME > NEEDS THAT > WE ARE NOT ADDRESSING? > > [Paul] Agreed. No need to shout. Not my intention to shout, but to allow a person scanning the text to find the key points faster. I don't think * cuts it, but if all caps is being misinterpreted, then I'll need to find a better method. Maybe key concepts should be on separate lines. Maybe a triple *** would be better, but that might also provide more emphasis than I intended. I'll play around with it. Chas. Munat
Received on Friday, 24 August 2001 20:28:23 UTC