- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 09:33:18 -0800
- To: "Bailey, Bruce" <Bruce_Bailey@ed.gov>
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org, "'Al Gilman'" <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
At 11:53 AM 3/7/01 -0500, Bailey, Bruce wrote:
>what about summary=""
If it's not a *required* attribute it's not necessary. However, I don't
think it can hurt anything.
The tools that decide whether its omission is prohibitive of the right to
assert Triple-A conformance will likelier parse in accordance with the "Al
is no doubt correct" view - and we only bordered on "testy" so no apology
is necessary, but thanks for (rare indeed) document praise.
--
Love.
ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2001 12:33:42 UTC