- From: Anne Pemberton <apembert@crosslink.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 07:41:11 -0500
- To: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Kynn, I suspect you are making a moutian out of a molehill. Your Virtual Dog Show site is about dogs. Add a dog picture to the opening page, and you have made the page accessible to those who use pictures for navigation. Another point (I think I suggested this to you some time back), was to change the word on the link that goes directly to the pictures of the dog entrants to something more illustrative of the page than the word "Catalog". "Dogs" or Dog Pictures would be more illustrative. There is also still the problem of the ad at the top of the page from "Living Free" that, most times I've visited, shows a cat or two, adding more confusion as to what the site is really about. When visiting the page, the message that the site is about dogs doesn't happen unless the text is read. I didn't check this morning, but when I looked at the catalog pages before I noticed the graphics were too small to be usable, and would be greatly improved by having the full-sized picture available by clicking on the small one. If you want people to understand why a dog was chosen for a prize, you need to supply a better/larger picture. In the commonly used authoring programs for simple pages, such as Front Page, it's very easy to add a graphic, but it's not apparent unless you are very familiar with the software, to add the alt tag, and not possible to add a long description without knowing html. Likewise, it is easy to add a table to organize information but tagging it for all users is an onerous (Squicky?) task. It will not require a total redesign of the page to includ a picture of a dog at the top of the site. You now have a nice graphic of a blue ribbon where the dog should be. The blue ribbon can be moved to the top right of the page leaving the page title between the two illustrative graphics (the blue ribbon indicates there is a contest involved). Can you ask the sponsor to put dog picture/s in their ad on this page? When I read the guidelines, I was happy with the term "multi-media", which I took to include simple graphics, photos, drawings, etc. I don't read into it that you *have* to use the fancy stuff. My husband, who is my frequently used example of what people with dyslexia/cognitive disabilities need and want on the web, is planning a web page for an organization he belongs to. He has decided the graphics he will use, but is flummoxed (squicked?) by writing the text. His "brand" of dyslexia impacts his text writing more than his text reading so he is impacted more by the requirement to include text on a page than to include graphics. As with the rest of the accessibility guidelines, the needs are best addressed in the planning of the page instead of adding it later. Anne Anne L. Pemberton http://www.pen.k12.va.us/Pav/Academy1 http://www.erols.com/stevepem/Homeschooling apembert@crosslink.net Enabling Support Foundation http://www.enabling.org
Received on Monday, 27 March 2000 17:07:15 UTC