- From: Scott Luebking <phoenixl@netcom.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 14:50:55 -0800 (PST)
- To: apembert@crosslink.net, charles@w3.org, jay@peepo.com, phoenixl@netcom.com
- Cc: nir@nirdagan.com, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Hi, Anne The context in which the statement was made was when a blind person and a sighted person might need to reference the same dynamically generated web page. In this situation, it is probably easier for a sighted person to use a web page designed for a blind user than it is for a blind person to use a web page designed for a sighted user. If they need not be referencing the same dynamically web page, then your comments are reasonable. Scott > Scott, > A sighted person could use web pages designed for blind user only to the > same extent that blind persons can use web pages designed for "average" > users. Blind persons *can* use web pages loaded with graphics and missing > alt tags as long as there is some text or sound. Likewise, sighted users > *can* use web pages without graphics and visual formatting. But neither > user is well served. The blind users can't access the information in the > graphics, and the sighted users can't access graphics that aren't there. I > suspect that the blind person who made this statement is mis-informed on > the prevelence of sighted users who depend on the visual elements as surely > as blind users depend on their speech synthesizers. A blind user without > speech equipment would find an all-text presentation as useless as a > cognitively impaired person would. > > Anne > Anne L. Pemberton > http://www.pen.k12.va.us/Pav/Academy1 > http://www.erols.com/stevepem/Homeschooling > apembert@crosslink.net > Enabling Support Foundation > http://www.enabling.org
Received on Wednesday, 26 January 2000 17:51:18 UTC