- From: Wendy A Chisholm <chisholm@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 21:55:03 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
After reading Anne's and Jason's comments, I am resending my response from 31 August. Note that it contains proposed text for the Errata page. There are two issues that were combined into one thought in Guideline 1. Deafness *does* need to be mentioned because of the difficulty that some people have reading written text if Sign Language is their primary language. I look forward to comments. thanks, --wendy At 02:44 PM 8/31/99 , Wendy A Chisholm wrote: >hello, > >We caught the same statement in the introduction during last call, but we >must have missed this one in the guideline text. > >In the Introducation we more clearly describe text equivalents and non-text >equivalents. Including the following paragraph: > >Non-text equivalents of text (e.g., icons, pre-recorded speech, or a video >of a person translating the text into sign language) can make documents >accessible to people who may have difficulty accessing written text, >including many individuals with cognitive disabilities, learning >disabilities, and deafness. Non-text equivalents of text can also be >helpful to non-readers. An auditory description is an example of a non-text >equivalent of visual information. An auditory description of a multimedia >presentation's visual track benefits people who cannot see the visual >information. > >I propose that we direct people to the Introduction from the errata page >and edit the text of Guideline 1 in a future version. > >The entry in the errata page might read something like this: >3. Clarification of rationale for Guideline 1 >Added: 1 September 1999 >Class: clarification >The rationale for Guideline 1 is confusing because it implies that people >with deafness benefit from the use of synthesized speech ("...Synthesized >speech is critical for individuals who are blind and for many people with >the reading difficulties that often accompany cognitive disabilities, >learning disabilities, and deafness....") The issue that some people >with deafness, cognitive and learning disabilities may share is a >difficulty reading written text. Sign language is often the primary >language for many people with deafness, thus written text is secondary and >they may not be as fluent. Please refer to the discussion of text and >non-text equivalents in the Introduction to the Web Content Accessibility >Guidelines. (http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WAI-WEBCONTENT-19990505/#Introduction) > >--wendy > >At 10:11 AM 8/31/99 , you wrote: >>I believe the intent here was to say something like: >>"Also, synthesized speech is (may be) critical for people with the speaking >>difficulties that sometimes accompany cognitive disabilities, learning >>disabilities (?), and deafness." >> >>Perhaps the confusion could be fixed simply by saying: >>"Synthesized speech is critical for individuals who are blind and for many >>people with the reading or speaking difficulties that often accompany >>cognitive disabilities, learning disabilities, and deafness." , >>although this might be too convoluted to be entirely clear. >> >>Maybe a separate sentence is indeed needed. >> >>Regards, >>Chuck Letourneau >> >>At 30/08/99 11:03 AM , keren beth moses wrote: >>> >>>Here's one mistake in the w3c accessibility guidelines: >>> >>>"Synthesized speech is critical for individuals who are blind and for many >>>people with the reading difficulties that often accompany cognitive >>>disabilities, learning disabilities, and deafness." (Guideline 1) >>> >>>Maybe just too much info in one sentence, but it implies that synthesized >>>speech is critical for the deaf. >>> >>>-- Keren >>> >>> >> >>---- >>Starling Access Services >> "Access A World Of Possibility" >> e-mail: info@starlingweb.com >> URL: http://www.starlingweb.com >> Phone: 613-820-2272 FAX: 613-820-6983 >> >wendy chisholm >human factors engineer >trace research and development center >university of wisconsin - madison, USA > wendy chisholm human factors engineer trace research and development center university of wisconsin - madison, USA
Received on Wednesday, 1 September 1999 22:55:47 UTC