- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <po@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 23:54:49 -0600
- To: "'Judy Brewer'" <jbrewer@w3.org>, "'GL - WAI Guidelines WG'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Very good overall Couple comments / suggestions - I think that the link should be to a statement on the WAI site which explains the purpose of the AA Rating, and the particular document that was used to determine the rating. The home page can in turn be pointed to from this place... but going directly to the home page could be confusing. - instead of " Claims of conformance to this document by other documents (policies, standards, other guidelines, etc.) or by processes (automated validation, human evaluation, etc.) must: how about " Claims that a process (machine validation, human evaluation) or the contents of a set of guidelines, policies or standards conform to or are based on these Web Contents Guidelines must: or some such. It is a bit wordier but helps to separate this from the next type of comformance. You might also consider reversing the two so that the page or site conformance is first to get that out of the way and out of peoples heads as they read the second.... Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Human Factors Dept of Ind. Engr. - U of Wis. Director - Trace R & D Center Gv@trace.wisc.edu, http://trace.wisc.edu/ FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our listserves send "lists" to listproc@trace.wisc.edu -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Judy Brewer Sent: Monday, March 22, 1999 4:54 PM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: Conformance proposal re-drafted The versions of the conformance statement in the February 26 & March 16 drafts are quite different. In the Feb 26 draft, the conformance statement referred to documents (e.g. other guidelines, standards, etc.) or processes (e.g., evaluation); while in the March 16 draft the conformance statement implies a page or site. The proposal below separates out these two types of conformance, provides examples of each, and slightly simplifies the language: **** 5. Conformance: This document defines three conformance levels: - Conformance Level "A": satisfying all Priority 1 checkpoints; - Conformance Level "Double-A": satisfying all Priority 1 and 2 checkpoints; - Conformance Level "Triple-A": satisfying all Priority 1, 2, and 3 checkpoints. Claims of conformance to this document by other documents (policies, standards, other guidelines, etc.) or by processes (automated validation, human evaluation, etc.) must: - specify the conformance level required or implemented in the document or process; - specify the title of this Guidelines document; - specify the URI of this Guidelines document. Example: "This standard conforms to conformance level 'Double-A' of 'Web Content Accessibility Guidelines' available at http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WD-WAI-PAGEAUTH-19990316." Claims of conformance to this document by pages or sites must: - specify the conformance level satisfied ("A," "Double-A," or "Triple-A"); - provide a link to the Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) home page. Example: "<A HREF="http://www.w3.org/WAI">WAI</A> Double-A." **** Reactions? - Judy ---------- Judy Brewer jbrewer@w3.org +1.617.258.9741 http://www.w3.org/WAI Director, Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) International Program Office World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) MIT/LCS Room NE43-355, 545 Technology Square, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
Received on Tuesday, 23 March 1999 00:59:09 UTC