- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <po@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 18:13:14 -0600
- To: <pjenkins@us.ibm.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Regarding comment #3 - this is an interesting thought. We'll need to see if we can do this without making the page less understandable or if any of these need to be more narrow... but it seems to me that we should be able to do this. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Human Factors Dept of Ind. Engr. - U of Wis. Director - Trace R & D Center Gv@trace.wisc.edu, http://trace.wisc.edu/ FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our listserves send "lists" to listproc@trace.wisc.edu 3. use the same terms in all checkpoints, for example, in the Priority 1 checkpoints: change: "all information conveyed", "document's text", "content of each page", "the screen", "the site's content", dynamic "content", "information", "the page", etc. to: "the content", for example 4.1 Ensure that the contents conveyed with color is also ... 6.1 Clearly identify changes in the natural language of the contents. 8.3 Ensure that the contents is organized... 9.2 Avoid any blinking or updating of the content that causes flicker. 16.1 Use language that is clear and simple, yet appropriate for the content. Note: eliminating the word "page" or "site" also allows the checkpoint to be flexibly applied on a page by page basis or on a site basis. Regards, Phill Jenkins (678-4517 tieline) 1-512-838-4517 Accessibility Program Manager IBM Special Needs Fax: 1-512-838-9367 11501 Burnet Rd pjenkins@us.ibm.com Austin TX 78758 http://www.ibm.com/sns
Received on Sunday, 21 March 1999 01:21:22 UTC