- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 18:41:49 -0500
- To: Masayasu Ishikawa <mimasa@w3.org>
- CC: tenkate@natlab.research.philips.com, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org, ph@w3.org, dd@w3.org
Masayasu Ishikawa wrote: > > Warner ten Kate wrote: > > > I am not stating the guidelines are not beneficial > > to the wider area, but I would suggest to restrict > > the scope of the Guidelines to access by disabled people > > more clearly (the Abstract does mention this). > > I expect doing this will help the understanding of > > the document and its use. > > I fully agree with Warner on this point. I think the easiest will be to state up front (in the Abstract and perhaps the Introduction) that the Guidelines have the primary goal of promoting accessibility. If, in later rationales, we promote general benefits alongside specific accessibility needs, I don't think we're undermining the strength of the document. > > - checkpoint 5.1: > > I was confused by the wording "nest". I understood that as, eg, [snip] The question of "nesting" (i.e., no skipping levels) will be addressed by the Working Group at the next teleconference. - Ian -- Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) Tel/Fax: (212) 684-1814 http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Received on Saturday, 13 March 1999 18:40:54 UTC