- From: eric hansen <ehansen@ets.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 09:47:40 -0500 (EST)
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Daniel Darailler wrote: "For what it's worth, at the time this conformance schema was discussed, I suggested A, AA and AAA." Eric now writes: Daniel's suggestion has couple of advantages. It seems very intuitive. (This kind of grading or rating system is well-known in North America. I don't know how well it would communicate in other parts of the world.) It also recognizes the significance and value of addressing merely the Priority 1 issues by assigning an "A." It would be important to set consistent ways of referring to the levels. For example: A-level (or "single-A") accessibility rating AA-level (or "double-A") accessibility rating AAA-level (or "triple-A") accessibility rating It might be helpful to generally attach the word "level," especially for the single-A level, since "A" can refer to other things (Anchor element and the word "A"). Perhaps what are now referred to as "conformance levels" should simply be called "accessibility ratings" or, more specifically, "W3C Web content accessibility ratings." ============================= Eric G. Hansen, Ph.D. Development Scientist Educational Testing Service ETS 12-R Rosedale Road Princeton, NJ 08541 (W) 609-734-5615 (Fax) 609-734-1090 E-mail: ehansen@ets.org
Received on Thursday, 4 March 1999 10:23:50 UTC