- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 10:17:19 +0100
- To: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- cc: ehansen@ets.org, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
> This numbering is backwards. If you use numbers, level 1 of conformance
> must be the strictest. The die is cast in the order used for priorities.
> Don't cross up the reader by reversing your field here.
>
> Sorry I didn't catch this earlier. Thanks to Eric for making the
> proposition clear.
>
> Otherwise define an enumeration of adverbs, for example {essentially,
> substantially, entirely} conformant, for conformance to all { P1 , P1 & P2
> , P1 & P2 & P3 } checkpoints.
For what it's worth, at the time this conformance schema was
discussed, I suggested A, AA and AAA.
Received on Thursday, 4 March 1999 04:17:48 UTC