Re: Simplifying the structure of the guidelines

Actually I think that orientation is somewhat different to graceful
transformation/device independence, but I agree with Daniel that the
guidelines could all be placed in one section.

Charles McCN

On Fri, 19 Feb 1999, Daniel Dardailler wrote:

  I still think the current split in 
    A. Transform Gracefully 
    B. Orientation, Navigation, and Comprehension 
  is arbitrary and uneccessarily complicating the guidelines flow.
  It's all about device independence and transforming gracefully, and
  orientation, navigation are just applicative aspects of this problem.
  If I look at checkpoints under B1, B2 and B3, most of them are here so
  that the "page remains usable - that is navigatable for instance -
  despite user, technological, or situational constraints." which is
  what A starts with.
  OK, now suppose you can argue with me about what I just said, and ask
  yourself how much of that argument is going to be relevant for the
  target audience of these guidelines ??
  I think a simpler and better Table of Content would be:
    A. Intro (talking about transform gracefully and navigation)
    B. Guidelines (numbered 1 to 17)
    C. D. etc. same as current

--Charles McCathieNevile  
phone: +1 617 258 0992
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative
MIT/LCS  -  545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, 02139,  USA

Received on Friday, 19 February 1999 09:52:03 UTC