- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 17:49:38 -0500 (EST)
- To: WAI GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
This was about what I had in mind, more eloquently expressed. (But that's what I expect from Ian.) Charles McCN On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Ian Jacobs wrote: Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > > I think we identified someplaces where a discussion of including > Mathematical content could be included within the Guidelines document. I > still don't see a Guideline which relates to Math. Maybe a Checkpoint. I don't see any reason to single out "Math" and "Science" in the Guidelines. What particular accessibility issues do they raise? What distinguishes those subjects from Architecture or Philosophy or Art History? I could see adding a checkpoint to the guidelines that reads something like: "Where it's possible to mark up content (for example mathematical equations) instead of using images, use a markup language." Then, in the techniques document, one could talk about using MathML to mark up math content. - Ian -- Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org) Tel/Fax: (212) 684-1814 http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs --Charles McCathieNevile - mailto:charles@w3.org phone: * +1 (617) 258 0992 * http://purl.oclc.org/net/charles W3C Web Accessibility Initiative - http://www.w3.org/WAI 545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, USA
Received on Monday, 25 January 1999 17:49:42 UTC