- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 17:49:38 -0500 (EST)
- To: WAI GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
This was about what I had in mind, more eloquently expressed. (But that's
what I expect from Ian.)
Charles McCN
On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Ian Jacobs wrote:
Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>
> I think we identified someplaces where a discussion of including
> Mathematical content could be included within the Guidelines document. I
> still don't see a Guideline which relates to Math. Maybe a Checkpoint.
I don't see any reason to single out "Math" and "Science" in
the Guidelines. What particular accessibility issues do they raise?
What distinguishes those subjects from Architecture or Philosophy
or Art History?
I could see adding a checkpoint to the guidelines that reads
something like:
"Where it's possible to mark up content (for example
mathematical equations) instead of using images,
use a markup language."
Then, in the techniques document, one could talk about
using MathML to mark up math content.
- Ian
--
Ian Jacobs (jacobs@w3.org)
Tel/Fax: (212) 684-1814
http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
--Charles McCathieNevile - mailto:charles@w3.org
phone: * +1 (617) 258 0992 * http://purl.oclc.org/net/charles
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative - http://www.w3.org/WAI
545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, USA
Received on Monday, 25 January 1999 17:49:42 UTC