- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 12:09:22 -0500 (EST)
- To: Gregg Vanderheiden <po@trace.wisc.edu>
- cc: "'GL - WAI Guidelines WG'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
On Wed, 20 Jan 1999, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: We are concerned that there is not a P1 checkpoint specifically for cognitive disability concerns but the group could not come up with any others that didn't seem to already be covered (at their base level - they will be expanded on in the techniques doc). CMN:: I do not like the idea of making something a P1 "to show support" - I think it should only be done because 'failure to do this means some group will be unable to access the content'. GV:: Checkpoint B.3.1 is currently a Priority 2. Could it be raised to Priority 1? "Use the simplest and most straightforward language that is possible for the content of your site. [Priority 2] " CMN:: It could, particularly if we explained why in the rationale. Testing of language is a notoriously hard thing to do, but the principle is well-established. For example, many countries have made significant attempts to render laws in plain language. GV:: Checkpoint B.3.2 is currently a Priority 3, but might be a Priority 2. "Use icons or graphics (with alternative text) where they facilitate comprehension of the page. [Priority 3] " CMN:: It should. My '7 sins and 7 virtues', as its first virtue, says 'use images. carefully.' They can serve to increase comprehension significantly (hence their popularity) for large groups of people. But they have associated problems (as we have discussed) so I don't think they should be a P1. GV:: We also considered giving one or both a variable priority, along the lines of, "If the information is important to understanding the page, make it a P1 otherwise P2." CMN:: I think we should have a general staement in the introduction which says something about important information/functionality, and 'presentational candy' - in the latter case it is acceptable to let the content/function disappear so long as it doesn't break the document. Charles --Charles McCathieNevile - mailto:charles@w3.org phone: * +1 (617) 258 0992 * http://purl.oclc.org/net/charles W3C Web Accessibility Initiative - http://www.w3.org/WAI 545 Technology sq., Cambridge MA, USA
Received on Wednesday, 20 January 1999 12:09:27 UTC