- From: Robert C. Neff <rcn@fenix2.dol-esa.gov>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 16:58:54 -0500
- To: "'w3c-wai-gl@w3.org'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
1. Seems A.8 should be more clear on when to use tables and when not to use them. This needs to ensure it mirrors the QuickTips or vica versa. I would support a statement where to ask not to use tables for formating text, and layout. For example, navigation bars are not good if they are used in a table. 2. Just before A.1 is a paragraph labeled 2. This discusses cross platform. Shouldnt this be cross browser? Cross platform means across different operating systems. 3. I can see people eventually using HTML 4, but i think we still should be approaching HTML 3.2 design as an interim methodology. Maybe this can be weaved into the forward? Why? Please read... Many webmasters for the government must design for the lowest common denominator on the internet and intranet. That is, you cant always count on the intranet/internet to be one browser and version. Therefore I think we should include information that states how to design and redesign your current site is important - maybe another forum would be good for this. Show them how to check and then fix their sight - offer a solution until the point where everyone migrates to HTML 4 on that world upgrade day :) You need to remember the dark ages where people still have 386s, 486s and pentiums with little or no RAM/Disk space. There are two barriers to one enterprise upgrade of an HTML 4 browser: a. They are memory hogs and not all PCs can support them. If you surveyed the Information Technology office in each government agency, they could not all tell you what they have (PCs and browsers). b. Security is an issue and needs to be review before implemented. Even though they have administration kits where technology can be mastered and toggled on and off by some people. Managers are afraid of what the user will do with the new features if they have access to them - what security holes will they open? What changes will users make that are contrary to the Information Technology Policy. The Information Technology types that control policy and implementation need to be educated. That is, tell them how to do it. How about someone writing a position paper for Microsoft and Netscape Where they tell them how to ensure Universal Accessibility and how their system can be used to implement it. my apologies for just now chiming into provide comments and some late remarks. Robert Neff
Received on Tuesday, 12 January 1999 17:00:39 UTC