- From: Brian Kelly <lisbk@ukoln.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1998 15:02:58 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Hi I attended the WAI meeting at the RNIB in Peterborough last week. I had lots of questions which various WAI wg chairs suggested I raise on the mailing list. I hope I'm not asking a FAQ (I had a quick scan of the archive and couldn't find anything) and that I'm using the correct list. I'm asking my questions in my role as an adviser to UK Universities on web issues. I've been promoting the use of style sheets for some time. Architecturally they're clearly the way forward. In a number of my HTML files I use CSS for simple things such as indenting the left margin (to make use of white space) or outdenting the right margin (so that actions in minutes stand out) and drawing boxes around paragraphs to emphasise decisions. Although I have had no problems using Internet Explorer my colleagues who use Netscape have lots of problems with paragraphs not being printed correctly if at all. These are the type of simple but valuable features which people who start to use CSS will begin with. The printing problems with these simple features on one of the most widely used browsers will surely put people off CSS - and potentially put people of the GL guidelines. I had hoped at the WAI meeting at the RNIB to hear of some magic behind the scenes which would overcome this problem (i.e. an Apache module which would implement some form of CSS content negotiation to strip out troublesome CSS). However I did not hear any encouraging news about things such as transparent content / feature negotiation. Instead of a technological fix the GL Guidelines see the solution to backwards compatibility problems to be the (rapid?) demise of old browsers. Various others have made similar predictions (XML, XSL, RDF, ... will be so good that everyone will upgrade just as everyone through away their Gopher clients when they first saw Mosaic). I'm rather dubious about this. Jakob Neilson in his March 22 Alertbox column described "The Increasing Conservatism of Web Users" (see http://www.useit.com/alertbox/980322.html) He argued that user's will only upgrade their browsers very slowly and that new technologies need to be deployed by making the servers smarter. The W3C Core Style Gallery seems to be doing this by using browser-sniffing to send "safe" CSS. To sum up. I'm worried that the premise of the GL guidelines and the culture associated with it (CSS good, tables bad), while architecturally sound, is not currently deployable and attempting to do this could result in a backlash. I hope someone can convince me that I'm wrong! Thanks Brian Kelly ------------------------------------------------------ Brian Kelly, UK Web Focus UKOLN, University of Bath, BATH, England, BA2 7AY Email: b.kelly@ukoln.ac.uk URL: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ Homepage: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/ukoln/staff/b.kelly.html Phone: 01225 323943 FAX: 01225 826838
Received on Tuesday, 4 August 1998 10:05:25 UTC