- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charlesn@sunrise.srl.rmit.edu.au>
- Date: Mon, 3 Aug 1998 11:48:33 +1000 (EST)
- To: WAI GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Daniel said my example is ridiculously complex. That's true. Where it would apply is to nested OBJECTs. The IMG might be a default for an image, rather than a wrapper OBJECT. I would prefer to push for OBJECT anyway. If LONGDESC is recommended practise for the future, D-link will continue to suffer. Since there is no real alternative in any UA so far, that seems unacceptable in the short to medium term. Daniel also thought we should drop the idea of using PARAM to provide a D-link/LONGDESC for OBJECT. I disagree. OBJECT is in such a prototype state at the moment that it we could implement it with very little legacy implication (by contrast to the LONGDESC/D-link case). And as an historian, I too like PARAM better than A REL="longdesc" Charles McCN
Received on Sunday, 2 August 1998 22:11:38 UTC