Re: EARL Testcase

The OWL example I posted to WCAG shows how to do the binding using
off-the-shelf standards instead of inventing stuff for EARL - (the code
example at step 2 which is avaialble on its own as

It runs out that testId is not in the schema, although it is used in an
example in the spec draft. I regarded this as a reason not to use it. And I
think that it is better to use pure OWL than to write special terms in EARL
that a processor needs to understand before it can do anything useful.



On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Chris Ridpath wrote:

>Yes, we need the binding.
>Can you suggest a method of binding the tool specific test to the standard
>test suite?

Received on Thursday, 15 April 2004 18:52:23 UTC