- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 18:52:23 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>
- Cc: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>, 'WAI ER IG List' <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
The OWL example I posted to WCAG shows how to do the binding using off-the-shelf standards instead of inventing stuff for EARL - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004AprJun/0025 (the code example at step 2 which is avaialble on its own as http://www.w3.org/2004/04/combineTests.rdf It runs out that testId is not in the schema, although it is used in an example in the spec draft. I regarded this as a reason not to use it. And I think that it is better to use pure OWL than to write special terms in EARL that a processor needs to understand before it can do anything useful. cheers Chaals On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Chris Ridpath wrote: > >Yes, we need the binding. > >Can you suggest a method of binding the tool specific test to the standard >test suite?
Received on Thursday, 15 April 2004 18:52:23 UTC