RE: EARL Testcase

agreed.

i've also been playing around with this type of code:


<earl:Assertion
rdf:about="http://vendor-a.org/tool/tests/#check-for-alt">
  <earl:subject rdf:resource="#subject"/>
  <earl:result rdf:parseType="Resource">
    <earl:validity
rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL/nmg-strawman#pass"/>
    <earl:confidence
rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL/nmg-strawman#low"/>
    <earl:message>ALT Tags Exist</earl:message>
  </earl:result>
  <earl:mode
rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL/nmg-strawman#automatic"/> 
  <earl:testcase
rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/#tech-text-equivalent"/>
  <earl:assertedBy rdf:resource="#assertor"/>
</earl:Assertion>


...which makes aggregation very comfortable but kind of turns EARL
inside out (as i understand the current spec).

to me it makes sense as an assertion is really about the specific test
which the tool conducts, the earl:testcase should be optional if this
test really maps to a test suite. comments welcome...


-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Ridpath [mailto:chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca] 
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 20:36
To: Shadi Abou-Zahra; 'WAI ER IG List'
Subject: Re: EARL Testcase


Works for me.

Although I'm not sure about the use of the "rdf:about" and
"rdf:resource"
attributes. Should these both be "rdf:resource" attributes?

Charles - Any comments?

Chris


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Shadi Abou-Zahra" <shadi@w3.org>
To: "'Chris Ridpath'" <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>; "'WAI ER IG List'"
<w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 2:15 PM
Subject: RE: EARL Testcase


>
> hi,
>
> currently i'm just using this hack for my prototype:
>
>
> <earl:testcase
> rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/#tech-text-equivalent">
>   <earl:testId
> rdf:resource="http://vendor-a.org/tool/tests/#check-for-alt" />
> </earl:testcase>
>
>
> regards,
>   shadi
>

Received on Thursday, 15 April 2004 14:46:22 UTC