- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:51:15 +0100
- To: "Leonard R. Kasday" <kasday@acm.org>
- cc: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org, w3t-qa@w3.org
> I'm wondering: in the html example could we make the info in the comment > field more machine readable? we could, we don't have to right now. we can add it later. > In fact, if we have a way to point into an invalid html document, do we > even need the comment, since the expected result is pointing to it? the expected result is a pointer to the spec, while the comments is an observation by the tool of a problem. > Len > > At 04:49 PM 3/14/01 +0100, Daniel Dardailler wrote: > >3) a web page has an HTML syntax error > > > >on 2001/03/14 sean@w3.uk, says that: > > web-content at http://example.org/page > > fails > > comments: syntax error, line12, missing ul > > http://w3.org/html4/testassertion123 > > according to http://validator.w3.org/html > > auto mode > > purpose: checking html4 dtd content model > > expected result: see w3.org/tr/html4#ul > > -- > Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D. > Institute on Disabilities/UAP and Dept. of Electrical Engineering at Temple > University > (215) 204-2247 (voice) (800) 750-7428 (TTY) > http://astro.temple.edu/~kasday mailto:kasday@acm.org > > Chair, W3C Web Accessibility Initiative Evaluation and Repair Tools Group > http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/ > > The WAVE web page accessibility evaluation assistant: > http://www.temple.edu/inst_disabilities/piat/wave/
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2001 04:51:20 UTC