Re: EARL properties details

> I'm wondering: in the html example could we make the info in the comment 
> field more machine readable?

we could, we don't have to right now. we can add it later.
 
> In fact, if we have a way to point into an invalid html document, do we 
> even need the comment, since the expected result is pointing to it?

the expected result is a pointer to the spec, while the comments is an 
observation by the tool of a problem. 
 
> Len
> 
> At 04:49 PM 3/14/01 +0100, Daniel Dardailler wrote:
> >3) a web page has an HTML syntax error
> >
> >on 2001/03/14 sean@w3.uk, says that:
> >  web-content at http://example.org/page
> >  fails
> >    comments: syntax error, line12, missing ul
> >  http://w3.org/html4/testassertion123
> >  according to http://validator.w3.org/html
> >  auto mode
> >  purpose: checking html4 dtd content model
> >  expected result: see w3.org/tr/html4#ul
> 
> --
> Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D.
> Institute on Disabilities/UAP and Dept. of Electrical Engineering at Temple 
> University
> (215) 204-2247 (voice)                 (800) 750-7428 (TTY)
> http://astro.temple.edu/~kasday         mailto:kasday@acm.org
> 
> Chair, W3C Web Accessibility Initiative Evaluation and Repair Tools Group
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/
> 
> The WAVE web page accessibility evaluation assistant: 
> http://www.temple.edu/inst_disabilities/piat/wave/

Received on Thursday, 15 March 2001 04:51:20 UTC