Re: EARL properties details

I like that level of specificity.

I'm wondering: in the html example could we make the info in the comment 
field more machine readable?

In fact, if we have a way to point into an invalid html document, do we 
even need the comment, since the expected result is pointing to it?


At 04:49 PM 3/14/01 +0100, Daniel Dardailler wrote:
>3) a web page has an HTML syntax error
>on 2001/03/14, says that:
>  web-content at
>  fails
>    comments: syntax error, line12, missing ul
>  according to
>  auto mode
>  purpose: checking html4 dtd content model
>  expected result: see

Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D.
Institute on Disabilities/UAP and Dept. of Electrical Engineering at Temple 
(215) 204-2247 (voice)                 (800) 750-7428 (TTY)

Chair, W3C Web Accessibility Initiative Evaluation and Repair Tools Group

The WAVE web page accessibility evaluation assistant:

Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2001 12:40:52 UTC