- From: Leonard R. Kasday <kasday@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 17:56:37 -0500
- To: love26@gorge.net (William Loughborough), Joshua Allen <joshuaa@microsoft.com>, "'Sean B. Palmer'" <sean@mysterylights.com>, Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Cc: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>, Rob Cameron <cameron@cs.sfu.ca>, WAI ER group <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>, Marja-Riitta Koivunen <marja@w3.org>
I added this idea to the list of scenarios at http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/earl.html Len At 04:52 AM 2/2/01 -0800, William Loughborough wrote: >At 08:27 PM 2/1/01 -0800, Joshua Allen wrote: >>?? Why not makea really simple definition of X (and I think X==HTTP >>would be a terrible idea) and then go for it? > >Why not indeed. > >Just as the author/user duality is blurring towards oblivion, so might >client/server. > >Where is the analogy to "The Rule of Law"? > >Somewhere in the mix of time-stamping|CC//PP|DIAP is a resolution for >"it's mine - no!, it's mine"? >-- >Love. > ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE > -- Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D. Institute on Disabilities/UAP and Dept. of Electrical Engineering at Temple University (215) 204-2247 (voice) (800) 750-7428 (TTY) http://astro.temple.edu/~kasday mailto:kasday@acm.org Chair, W3C Web Accessibility Initiative Evaluation and Repair Tools Group http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/ The WAVE web page accessibility evaluation assistant: http://www.temple.edu/inst_disabilities/piat/wave/
Received on Friday, 2 February 2001 17:56:37 UTC