- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 04:52:14 -0800
- To: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@microsoft.com>, "'Sean B. Palmer'" <sean@mysterylights.com>, Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Cc: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>, Rob Cameron <cameron@cs.sfu.ca>, WAI ER group <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>, Marja-Riitta Koivunen <marja@w3.org>
At 08:27 PM 2/1/01 -0800, Joshua Allen wrote:
>?? Why not makea really simple definition of X (and I think X==HTTP would
>be a terrible idea) and then go for it?
Why not indeed.
Just as the author/user duality is blurring towards oblivion, so might
client/server.
Where is the analogy to "The Rule of Law"?
Somewhere in the mix of time-stamping|CC//PP|DIAP is a resolution for "it's
mine - no!, it's mine"?
--
Love.
ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Friday, 2 February 2001 07:50:38 UTC