- From: Leonard R. Kasday <kasday@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 17:31:09 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
I'm experimenting with statements about statements, and I believe this is
the way to say
according the the wave tool
http://x.y/foo.gif has the property "alt_status" equal to the value "missing".
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:e="e/"
>
<!-- the alt_status of "image" is missing
call this "statement_1" by setting bagID="statement_1"
-->
<rdf:Description about="http://x.y/foo.gif" bagID="statement_1">
<e:alt_status> missing </e:alt_status>
</rdf:Description>
<!-- statement_1 was detected with the Wave tool -->
<rdf:Description aboutEach="#statement_1" >
<e:toolUsed> e:wave </e:toolUsed>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
----------
Note that "toolUsed" is not a property of the image. It's a property of
the statement _ABOUT_ the image.
I ran this through SiRPAC but I'm pretty sure I hit a bug in
SiRPAC. SiRPAC generates id's., and there's an id in the diagram that
isn't in the set of triples, and visa versa. If I set them equal the
diagram make sense. If I leave them as they are, the digram doesn't match
what I was trying to say.
Also, when the set of triples is even more verbose than the RDF. We need
to use more of a shorthand to help the discussion along.
--
Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D.
Institute on Disabilities/UAP and Dept. of Electrical Engineering at Temple
University
(215) 204-2247 (voice) (800) 750-7428 (TTY)
http://astro.temple.edu/~kasday mailto:kasday@acm.org
Chair, W3C Web Accessibility Initiative Evaluation and Repair Tools Group
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/
The WAVE web page accessibility evaluation assistant:
http://www.temple.edu/inst_disabilities/piat/wave/
Received on Friday, 2 February 2001 17:31:10 UTC