- From: Leonard R. Kasday <kasday@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 17:31:09 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
I'm experimenting with statements about statements, and I believe this is the way to say according the the wave tool http://x.y/foo.gif has the property "alt_status" equal to the value "missing". <?xml version="1.0"?> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:e="e/" > <!-- the alt_status of "image" is missing call this "statement_1" by setting bagID="statement_1" --> <rdf:Description about="http://x.y/foo.gif" bagID="statement_1"> <e:alt_status> missing </e:alt_status> </rdf:Description> <!-- statement_1 was detected with the Wave tool --> <rdf:Description aboutEach="#statement_1" > <e:toolUsed> e:wave </e:toolUsed> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF> ---------- Note that "toolUsed" is not a property of the image. It's a property of the statement _ABOUT_ the image. I ran this through SiRPAC but I'm pretty sure I hit a bug in SiRPAC. SiRPAC generates id's., and there's an id in the diagram that isn't in the set of triples, and visa versa. If I set them equal the diagram make sense. If I leave them as they are, the digram doesn't match what I was trying to say. Also, when the set of triples is even more verbose than the RDF. We need to use more of a shorthand to help the discussion along. -- Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D. Institute on Disabilities/UAP and Dept. of Electrical Engineering at Temple University (215) 204-2247 (voice) (800) 750-7428 (TTY) http://astro.temple.edu/~kasday mailto:kasday@acm.org Chair, W3C Web Accessibility Initiative Evaluation and Repair Tools Group http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/ The WAVE web page accessibility evaluation assistant: http://www.temple.edu/inst_disabilities/piat/wave/
Received on Friday, 2 February 2001 17:31:10 UTC