- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 11:54:04 -0400 (EDT)
- To: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- cc: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>, w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
Actually the problem is pretty well documented - talk to Earl Johnson, or Javier Romanach (to mention a couple of WAI participants who spring to my mind) about the need for people to have accelerated keyboard navigation around sites. The specification in HTML 4.0 is problematic - it is not clear how they should work, they rely on particular device features that are not always available (some of this is only in simplistic interpetation, but some is in the specification itself), and the implementations are inconsistent. (Actually I have some test pages too, and some results on them - if you're intereseted I will dig up the link). cheers Charles McCN On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, William Loughborough wrote: At 07:57 PM 9/11/00 -0400, Wendy A Chisholm wrote: >Per my action item today, here are test pages for accesskey and tabindex >as well as threads that discuss them. WL: I got to them OK but Opera has so many pre-empted keystrokes that I don't know if there's any point to <accesskey>. The listed keys do nothing. As to tabindex I think tabbing is just like it always is, goes to the next link. I think there'd have to be a lot of implementation before much can be determined. This whole thing's going on my back burner. It's an unavailable solution looking for a so-far-undetected problem as far as I can determine at this time. Let's talk about something else. -- Love. ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE -- Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia September - November 2000: W3C INRIA, 2004 Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Wednesday, 13 September 2000 11:54:12 UTC