- From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 08:47:29 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
Michael wrote: <blockquote> Technique 6.1.A - User notification of style sheet use. In suggested language, we need to acknowledge that Checkpoint 6.1 and Checkpoint 3.3 are mutually exclusive: one or the other will always be triggered. </blockquote> I propose that if 3.3 (Check document for use of style sheets) is triggered and fixed, then 6.1 should be triggered. Thus the following would occur: 1. the document does not use style sheets (3.3 triggered) 2. user adds style sheets 3. 6.1 triggered to verify that the style sheets transform gracefully However, if style sheets are identified, then 3.3 is not triggered but 6.1 is. I propose rewording 3.3 as: <blockquote> Technique 3.3.A [priority 2] Check document for use of style sheets. Discussion Status: awaiting discussion Evaluation: Check document for presence of STYLE or LINK rel="stylesheet" elements within the HEAD element or use of "style" attributes throughout the document. Example Language: Use style sheets to control layout and presentation. For example, use the CSS 'font' property instead of the HTML FONT element to control font styles Repair Technique: Notify the user if the document does not use style sheets. Once the user has added style sheets, trigger technique 6.1 to verify that the document is readable when style sheets are not applied. </blockquote> I don't believe a link to 3.3 is need from 6.1. I propose that 6.1 says, <blockquote> Technique 6.1.A [priority 1] Verify that the document is readable when style sheets are not applied. Discussion Status: awaiting discussion Evaluation: Triggers: -LINK element with a REL attribute set to 'stylesheet,' -STYLE element, -At least one "style" attribute used on any element. Example Language: Ensure this document can be read without stylesheets. Repair Technique: none Test Files and Discussion Files: </blockquote> -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative madison, wi usa tel: +1 608 663 6346 /--
Received on Thursday, 27 January 2000 08:45:48 UTC