- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 15:29:43 -0500
- To: "Michael Cooper" <mcooper@cast.org>, "Leonard R. Kasday" <kasday@acm.org>, "Wendy A Chisholm" <wendy@w3.org>, <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
At 02:25 PM 2000-02-24 -0500, Michael Cooper wrote: >> Actually, this brings up yet another point. Does anyone know the >> status of >> acessibility of Applets? IBM and Sun were doing some impressive things >> with Java accessibilty. >> > >Somebody from IBM or Sun may speak up, but in case they're not monitoring >the discussion - Applets have the same capability for accessibility as >standalone Java applications do. However, it relies on the Java >Accessibility API which is standard in Java 1.2 but is an extension to Java >1.1.x. Java 1.1.x is what most browsers currently have and I don't know if >you can configure the Virtual Machines that ship with browsers and aren't >standalone to use the Accessibility API. The workaround is for the user to >use the Java Plugin, but then the page author must include the applet on the >page as a plugin (using EMBED or perhaps OBJECT) instead of as an APPLET >which would automatically use the browser's internal Virtual Machine. > >Hopefully I got that right... > >Michael I think the situation may be better than that. I looked in the User Agent Working Group implementation notes but I did not find there a survey of the implementation of the Swing Set. This would be good to know. Thanks to the lawsuit, with my Win98 laptop I got, on a separate CD ROM, a [Sun-] Compliant Java VM. But I cannot find in the OS any way to find an "About" page for it that tells me what the Java VM I have installed is compliant _with_. Anybody know more about this? Al >
Received on Thursday, 24 February 2000 15:30:00 UTC