- From: Leonard R. Kasday <kasday@acm.org>
- Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 21:10:00 -0500
- To: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>, w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
Thanks Wendy. Looks good. Len At 06:06 PM 2/18/00 -0500, Wendy A Chisholm wrote: >Len commented that the content of NOFRAMES should be checked [1]. I also >realized that there was a minor technical error in the way the technique >was worded in the 21 december draft [2]. > >here is my proposal: ><blockquote> >Technique 6.5.1 [priority 2] Check that a NOFRAMES element exists within >each FRAMESET. >Discussion Status: >awaiting discussion >Evaluation: >A valid NOFRAMES element should exist within each FRAMESET. >The contents of the NOFRAMEs element must allow the user access to the site. >Not allowed: Telling the user that they should upgrade to a browser that >supports frames is not allowed. Suspicious words within the text a >NOFRAMES element: "upgrade," "full advantage," supports frames," "missing" etc. >Example of a message to be displayed: >Does your page work if frames are not loaded? >Repair Technique: >Allow user to construct a valid NOFRAMES. >Test Files and Discussion Files: >Link to test file for this technique. ></blockquote> > >[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-er-ig/2000Jan/0059.html >[2] http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/ert/ert-19991221.html > >-- >wendy a chisholm >world wide web consortium >web accessibility initiative >madison, wi usa >tel: +1 608 663 6346 >/-- > ------- Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D. Institute on Disabilities/UAP, and Department of Electrical Engineering Temple University 423 Ritter Annex, Philadelphia, PA 19122 kasday@acm.org http://astro.temple.edu/~kasday (215) 204-2247 (voice) (800) 750-7428 (TTY)
Received on Sunday, 20 February 2000 21:12:20 UTC