Re: Check that a NOFRAMES element exists within each FRAMESET (Technique 6.5.1 ).

Thanks Wendy.  Looks good.


At 06:06 PM 2/18/00 -0500, Wendy A Chisholm wrote:
>Len commented that the content of NOFRAMES should be checked [1].  I also 
>realized that there was a minor technical error in the way the technique 
>was worded in the 21 december draft [2].
>here is my proposal:
>Technique 6.5.1 [priority 2] Check that a NOFRAMES element exists within 
>Discussion Status:
>awaiting discussion
>A valid NOFRAMES element should exist within each FRAMESET.
>The contents of the NOFRAMEs element must allow the user access to the site.
>Not allowed: Telling the user that they should upgrade to a browser that 
>supports frames is not allowed.  Suspicious words within the text a 
>NOFRAMES element: "upgrade," "full advantage," supports frames," "missing" etc.
>Example of a message to be displayed:
>Does your page work if frames are not loaded?
>Repair Technique:
>Allow user to construct a valid NOFRAMES.
>Test Files and Discussion Files:
>Link to test file for this technique.
>wendy a chisholm
>world wide web consortium
>web accessibility initiative
>madison, wi usa
>tel: +1 608 663 6346

Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D.
Institute on Disabilities/UAP, and
Department of Electrical Engineering
Temple University
423 Ritter Annex, Philadelphia, PA 19122

(215) 204-2247 (voice)
(800) 750-7428 (TTY)

Received on Sunday, 20 February 2000 21:12:20 UTC