- From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2000 18:06:32 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
Len commented that the content of NOFRAMES should be checked [1]. I also realized that there was a minor technical error in the way the technique was worded in the 21 december draft [2]. here is my proposal: <blockquote> Technique 6.5.1 [priority 2] Check that a NOFRAMES element exists within each FRAMESET. Discussion Status: awaiting discussion Evaluation: A valid NOFRAMES element should exist within each FRAMESET. The contents of the NOFRAMEs element must allow the user access to the site. Not allowed: Telling the user that they should upgrade to a browser that supports frames is not allowed. Suspicious words within the text a NOFRAMES element: "upgrade," "full advantage," supports frames," "missing" etc. Example of a message to be displayed: Does your page work if frames are not loaded? Repair Technique: Allow user to construct a valid NOFRAMES. Test Files and Discussion Files: Link to test file for this technique. </blockquote> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-er-ig/2000Jan/0059.html [2] http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/ert/ert-19991221.html -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative madison, wi usa tel: +1 608 663 6346 /--
Received on Friday, 18 February 2000 18:02:32 UTC