Re: charter revisions, please review

At 2000-04-21 09:03-0400, Leonard R. Kasday wrote:
>where it says
>>Where we can not find a tool that implements a technique from the ERT, we 
>>          - Participate in developing open source software such as Amaya 
>> or Mozilla,
>>          - Develop a prototype to test that the technique is a sound 
>> suggestion,

Good Jist: omit above, make new section,

>How about making this a list of
>Related Deliverables.  These are deliverables that are not necessarily 
>products solely of this group, but are rather deliverables to which we 
>make a contribution.  Our contribution may include, but are not limited to
>      - design or code for open source software such as Mozilla, Amaya, etc.
>      - development of a prototype to test a design concept or promote 
> it's use

make parallel:
       - develop prototypes to test design concepts or promote use.

>      - documented discussions and feedback to developers of tools in 
> progress, such as
        - provide feedback to tool developers documenting tool evaluations,
          such as

>         A-Prompt, Bobby, WAVE, etc.
>This is largely a rewording and tweaking of philosopy.
>The one new thing is that feedback to developers would be 
>documented.  This means providing feedback as an actual document to a tool 
>developer, to tie together what would otherwise be scattered throughout 
>email and meeting notes.
>Maybe we should even break this out as a separate deliverable.

Received on Friday, 21 April 2000 18:14:50 UTC