W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Tutorials review for this week

From: Sylvie Duchateau <sylvie.duchateau@snv.jussieu.fr>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:36:34 +0200
Message-ID: <51C2DB32.3030503@snv.jussieu.fr>
To: Bim Egan <bim@w3.org>
Cc: "'EOWG (E-mail)'" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Hello Bim and all,
As I will have no time to look at this topic later today, I prefer 
replying to your email directly in the message below. I can add these in 
a wiki if necessary tomorrow morning.
My responses are marked with SD.
Best
Sylvie

Le 19/06/2013 19:45, Bim Egan a écrit :
> At this stage, areas that we would like you to focus on are:
>
> 1. How do these drafts work for different roles?
> For example
> * If you were a developer, is this engaging enough for you to read?
SD: Each page is short and precise, so I think it would be ok for a 
developer who needs to check rapidly what he can do to make accessible 
tables or images, for example.
> * If you were a trainer, is it organized in a way you can use?
SD: As a trainer, I particularly like the images part. I think it would 
be easy to use.
> * If you were non-technical, for instance a student, is it understandable?
SD: As a non technical reader, I also would prefer the way the images 
tutorial is presented. The tables one is a bit technical.
>
> 2. We need to reconsider what these should be called. Can we have another
> brainstorm for other possibilities?
SD: For me tutorials was fine, but OK for another brainstorming.
> 3. Currently we're using two different approaches. Please compare the
> overall approach used in the tables vs the images tutorials. Pages to focus
> on:
> Images:
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/app-notes/images/
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/app-notes/images/functional
> Tables:
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/app-notes/tables/
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/app-notes/tables/th-caption
SD: I prefer the images approach. It sounds clearer to me.
> 4. How can we make it clearer that each topic covers multiple web pages?
SD: what about writing this in this intro page: 
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/app-notes/


> 5. Each page has links to more info in WCAG. How can we present these so
> they don't detract from people progressing through the other pages in each
> topic?
SD: I don't understand this question. Could you explain more what you mean?

Finally, I have one comment for the main page:
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/app-notes/
Carousel is a link in the list of tutorials. You find it also 
"carousels" in the planned tutorials. Is it the same topic?
Best
Sylvie

> Kind regards,
>
> Bim
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Sylvie Duchateau
Association BrailleNet
Tél.: +33 (0) 1 44 27 26 25 / Fax : +33 (0) 1 44 27 34 38
www.braillenet.org / www.accessiweb.org
Received on Thursday, 20 June 2013 10:31:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:01 UTC