Re: updated: Business Case slides

Shawn,

+1 to what Karl said. Like I said in the survey last week, I'm perfectly comfortable with the document as it now stands.

Given a speaker who actually knows what he's talking about, I feel this document provides good guidelines and represents excellent material.

/Denis




On 2011-07-25, at 6:24 PM, Karl Groves wrote:

> Shawn,
> 
> Other than the feedback I've already given re: Slide #4 and the claims
> regarding Legal & General, I think the presentation has come a long way.
> Provided that the presenter thoroughly reads and understands the notes, they
> should be able to give an effective presentation.
> 
> Karl
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org]
>> On Behalf Of Shawn Henry
>> Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 2:47 PM
>> To: EOWG (E-mail)
>> Subject: updated: Business Case slides
>> 
>>  EOWG,
>> 
>> Based on the EOWG discussion on 22 July, I edited the [broad view of
>> accessibility] slide (5), changing the slide a bit and the Notes
> significantly.
>> After further input and thought, I was able to separate out the issues
> more
>> clearly. Currently the purpose of that slide is introduce the first part
> of the
>> presentation, not to have a compelling quote. So I've tried another
> revision
>> to better meet the purpose and get rid of the quote issues. I look forward
> to
>> your comments on how these work or might be further revised.
>> 
>> The two drafts are available for review:
>> * 25 July revision removing quotation aspects:
>> http://www.w3.org/WAI/presentations/bcase/bcase-presentation-format-
>> 2011-07July-25.ppt
>> * 23 July version with changes based on the 22 July EOWG decisions:
>> http://www.w3.org/WAI/presentations/bcase/bcase-presentation-format-
>> 2011-07July-23.ppt
>> 
>> Note that the latest version (which currently is the same as the 25 July
> one,
>> but could change) will be at:
>> http://www.w3.org/WAI/presentations/bcase/bcase-presentation-
>> format.ppt
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> ~Shawn (with editor hat on)
>> 
> 
> 
> 

Received on Monday, 25 July 2011 22:35:06 UTC