W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > January to March 2010

Publishing Accessible Presentations - reply by Wednesday 31 March

From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:28:16 -0500
Message-ID: <4BAD5F30.6030402@w3.org>
To: "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>, Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>

How to Make Presentations Accessible to All is updated online at:

Please let me know *by Wednesday 31 March* if you approve publishing it as a draft for review[1], have comments, or if you would like more time to review it.

Remember to send comments to the appropriate mailing list:
- EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org> for significant issues and things that need discussion
- EOWG editors <wai-eo-editors@w3.org> for minor editorial comments that don't need discussion

The Analysis with scope, etc.; links to previous drafts and EOWG minutes; and a list of changes made today is under: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-training#accessible


[1] Example announcement of a draft-for-review publication: http://www.w3.org/WAI/highlights/archive#x20100106a

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: For Review: Making Presentations Accessible [Rough Draft] - due 22 March
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:16:31 -0600
From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
To: EOWG (E-mail) <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
CC: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>


I have updated the analysis/requirements (including scope) and the draft document based on our EOWG teleconference discussion today.
* Analysis with scope, etc. is at: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-training#accessible
* Latest draft is at: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/training/access_pres

Please review both of these for content, and the document for high-level issues. (It is still rough so no need to comment on the detailed copyediting level yet.) Make sure to refresh with your browser to get the latest version.

Here are some questions for your review and comment via e-mail:
* Is anything missing? Are their areas where we want to provide more specific or detailed guidance? (Keep in mind the limited scope and desire to keep it short.)
* Should anything be cut out to simplify and shorten the document?
* What do you think about the terminology options: Presentations, Talks, Meetings, Training, Sessions? (Note what is included in the scope and what is out of scope, at http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-training#accessible )
* What about the title? Should we have a short title with only one term, and then in the first sentence clarify that it applies to different situations, using more of the terms? See title ideas at http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-training#title2
* What do you think about each editorial question throughout the draft document? They are highlighted green and surrounded by: [@@ question ?]

Please send comments to the EOWG list: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
(If you are compelled to send copyedits or other things that don't need EOWG consideration, send them to the EO editors' list: wai-eo-editors@w3.org )

When sending comments, please include the date and time of the document that your comments apply to. It is at the top after "Editor's Draft" in the format: $Date: 2010/03/12 13:23:59 $

Please send your comments in e-mail *by Monday 22 March*.


Shawn Lawton Henry
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
e-mail: shawn@w3.org
phone: +1.617.395.7664
about: http://www.w3.org/People/Shawn/
Received on Saturday, 27 March 2010 01:28:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:29:44 UTC