Re: "Accessible Web Browsing" document (summary and orientation information)

>> I think that as William suggests, a table of contents would be a 
>> start. I assume this is planned but has not been done yet as this is 
>> an early draft [1].
> 
> The "page contents" has been in place since the very first draft. Are 
> you suggestion something different? If so, what?

For pages like FAQs where there is a high likelihood that readers will want to jump to a certain section, we have used a more prominent contents listing, rather than the Page Contents box, e.g.:
http://www.w3.org/WAI/aria/faq

Perhaps that would be appropriate for this page?

~Shawn

Received on Wednesday, 2 December 2009 18:23:21 UTC