- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2009 11:16:47 +0100
- To: achuter@technosite.es
- CC: w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
I personally think that such a rigid and HTML-centric checklist is a step backwards. It seems like an exhaustive list of checks and people may think they are really done when they have ticked all the boxes. Best, Shadi Alan Chuter wrote: > Hi Anna, > > I wondered the same thing. The WCAG WG has not produced such a list, but > WebAIM have done one [1]. > > best regards, > > Alan > > > [1] http://webaim.org/standards/wcag/checklist > > > Anna.Zhuang@nokia.com escribió: >> Dear EOWG, >> >> I might have drowned in the ocean of WCAG 2.0 documentation so hope >> someone can resque me. >> >> >> WCAG 1.0 has "Checklist of Checkpoints for Web Content Accessibility >> Guidelines 1.0" http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/full-checklist.html Apart >> from being a handy quick to read doc it also has the definition of >> priorities 1,2,3. This is what a company would need to read in order >> to understand how priorities translate to (disabled) user experience. >> Where is the same material for WCAG 2.0? >> WCAG 2.0 overview page http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/wcag.php has a link >> to A, AA, AAA and when I click on it I get to Understanding >> conformance document. OKAY, but where is the definition of A, AA, AAA. >> The doc says that for A one needs to implement all A SCs and so on. >> But I don't see a simple translation of A-AAA levels to user experience? >> Does a checklist for WCAG 2.0 exist or do we only have How to Meet >> WCAG 2.0 document? >> Br, Anna >> >> >> > > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ | WAI International Program Office Activity Lead | W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Friday, 6 March 2009 10:17:27 UTC