Re: On WCAG checklist

I agree. They should explain that they have been explicit for HTML but 
not for other technologies. On the other hand, that is what most people 
will do themselves.




Shadi Abou-Zahra escribió:
> I personally think that such a rigid and HTML-centric checklist is a 
> step backwards. It seems like an exhaustive list of checks and people 
> may think they are really done when they have ticked all the boxes.
> 
> Best,
>   Shadi
> 
> 
> Alan Chuter wrote:
>> Hi Anna,
>>
>> I wondered the same thing. The WCAG WG has not produced such a list, 
>> but WebAIM have done one [1].
>>
>> best regards,
>>
>> Alan
>>
>>
>> [1] http://webaim.org/standards/wcag/checklist
>>
>>
>> Anna.Zhuang@nokia.com escribió:
>>> Dear EOWG,
>>>
>>> I might have drowned in the ocean of WCAG 2.0 documentation so hope 
>>> someone can resque me.
>>>
>>>
>>> WCAG 1.0 has "Checklist of Checkpoints for Web Content Accessibility 
>>> Guidelines 1.0" http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/full-checklist.html Apart 
>>> from being a handy quick to read doc it also has the definition of 
>>> priorities 1,2,3. This is what a company would need to read in order 
>>> to understand how priorities translate to (disabled) user experience.
>>> Where is the same material for WCAG 2.0?
>>> WCAG 2.0 overview page http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/wcag.php has a 
>>> link to A, AA, AAA and when I click on it I get to Understanding 
>>> conformance document. OKAY, but where is the definition of A, AA, 
>>> AAA. The doc says that for A one needs to implement all A SCs and so 
>>> on. But I don't see a simple translation of A-AAA levels to user 
>>> experience?
>>> Does a checklist for WCAG 2.0 exist or do we only have How to Meet 
>>> WCAG 2.0 document?
>>> Br, Anna
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> 


-- 
Alan Chuter
Departamento de Usabilidad y Accesibilidad
Consultor
Technosite - Grupo Fundosa
Fundación ONCE
Tfno.: 91 121 03 30
Fax: 91 375 70 51
achuter@technosite.es
http://www.technosite.es

Received on Friday, 6 March 2009 10:25:13 UTC