W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: Approval for publication of business case documents

From: Andrew Arch <andrew@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 18:24:35 +0100
Message-ID: <4A12EB53.7050201@w3.org>
To: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
CC: sylvie.duchateau@accessiweb.org, "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Hello Sylvie,

Shawn Henry wrote:
> Thanks, Sylvie.
> 
> Some replies below.
> 
>> I have just one question:
>> In the reference to WCAG 2.0 success criteria (over the four sub 
>> pages), how are the success criteria classified? By priority? As I 
>> don't see any chronological order in the listing of the success criteria.
>> Example:
>> In financial factors at:
>> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/bcase/fin.html
>> In "increase Web site Use", bullet:
>> clear and consistent design, navigation, and links
>> ( [WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria 2.4.4, 2.4.9, 2.4.5, 3.2.3, 3.2.4, 2.4.1, 
>> 2.4.6, 3.2.3, 3.2.4;]
> 
> Andrew: Any comment on this? Perhaps it would be best to put them in 
> numerical order?

While I'm sure there was some logic in this ordering originally, there 
seems no good reason not to list numerically now. The WCAG working group 
have also provided some comment on the appropriate success criteria to 
include that will be incorporated.

Regards, Andrew

>> Other question: do you plan to link to each success criteria or 
>> checkpoint?
> 
> EOWG decided not to link them, because it would increase clutter and 
> give them too much focus. (In case you want more information, you could 
> find the discussion in past EOWG minutes -- I'm not sure which ones, 
> though, so you'd have to search.)
> 
> Thanks,
> ~Shawn
Received on Tuesday, 19 May 2009 17:25:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:55:58 UTC