- From: Sylvie duchateau <sylvie.duchateau@snv.jussieu.fr>
- Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 12:06:52 +0100
- To: "Swan, Henny" <Henny.Swan@rnib.org.uk>
- Cc: Alan Chuter <achuter@technosite.es>, EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
I can be there too! Best Sylvie Swan, Henny a écrit : > I'll be there. Henny > > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Alan Chuter > Sent: 23 November 2007 10:48 > To: EOWG > Subject: Regrets all round: 23 November 2007 Teleconference > > It would be useful to know who *does* intend to take part today. If > it's only Shawn and myself perhaps it would be better to cancel this > week. > > regards, > > Alan > > > On 23/11/2007, hbj@visinfo.dk <hbj@visinfo.dk> wrote: >> Thought I could make today's call. But can't after all >> Helle >> >> -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- >> Fra: w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org] På vegne >> af Shawn Henry >> Sendt: 22. november 2007 05:52 >> Til: EOWG (E-mail) >> Emne: EOWG: Agenda for 23 November 2007 Teleconference >> >> >> Dear EOWG Participants: >> >> An agenda and logistics for our 23 November 2007 teleconference follow. >> >> Time: 8:30am - 10:30am U.S. Eastern Time. For other time zones see: >> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html >> Bridge: +1.617.761.6200 / +33.4.89.06.34.99 / +44.117.370.6152, code: EOWG# >> (3694#) >> IRC: Channel: #eo, server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665 >> >> Scribe: Henny (or Wayne or Andrew) (per >> www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/scribes.html) >> >> Agenda: >> >> 1. MWBP-WCAG Relationship >> * Requirements/Analysis: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-mwbp-wcag >> * Latest version is linked from the top of the Requirements/Analysis >> An updated version may be sent to the list before the teleconference. >> >> Some areas for discussion: >> a. The MWBP to WCAG section now incorporates both WCAG 1.0 and 2.0. They are >> in the same paragraph. Is that easy to understand with the "WCAG 1.0 /2.0" >> text in bold? Should WCAG 2.0 come first? >> b. The WCAG to MWBP section has two parts, first it runs through WCAG 2.0 >> and how the success criteria relate to MWBPs. Then another section covers >> WCAG 1.0 and how the checkpoints relate to to the MWBPs. This makes for a >> lot of redundant wording. Is this organization good because most people will >> only want to read one section or the other? Other ideas for organization? >> c. The cross references are often hyperlinks. This reduces redundancy and >> facilitates maintenance, but makes the document at time difficult to work >> with offline or on paper. To what extent should the document cite the actual >> text of WCAG (especially the techniques) and the MWBPs? >> d. In the section "How does it help especially users with disabilities?", >> the text runs "Best Practices that have no specific benefit for users with >> disabilities beyond that experienced by the general user in the mobile >> context is marked [no added benefit]" Is that clear? Some people apparently >> think it means that the MWBPs in question have no benefit for people with >> disabilities, which is not the intention. Ideas for a better way to say >> this? >> e. Ideas for the section "3. How Barriers Experienced by Web Users with >> Disabilities Parallel those in the Mobile Context"? >> >> 2. Approach to WAI-ARIA Documents >> * http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-aria-docs >> A document that maps the content for the new documents may be sent to the >> list before the teleconference. >> >> 3. WAI-ARIA FAQ >> * http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/ARIA/faq.html >> An updated version may be sent to the list before the teleconference. >> >> Regards, >> ~ Shawn >> >> === >> >> NOTE: If you reply to this email, please change the subject line. If you are >> sending regrets, add "Regrets" to the front of the current subject line. If >> you are commenting on a document or topic, put the document title or topic >> in the subject line. Thanks. >> >> IRC reminders and tips: >> - IRC is supplemental to the call. Some participants do not have IRC. All >> substantive comments should be said verbally in the call (not just in IRC). >> - To type a side comment that will _not_ get recorded in the minutes, type >> /me comment - e.g.: >> /me hopes everyone had pleasant holidays >> will come out: >> *shawn hopes everyone had pleasant holidays >> >> Teleconference information: >> - Managing IRC for EOWG meeting minutes: >> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/template.html >> - W3C Zakim Teleconference Bridge: http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim >> - Zakim IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot >> - A source for help with IRC (Internet Relay Chat): http://www.irchelp.org/ >> >> * Upcoming EOWG teleconference schedule: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/#meetings >> >> ### >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
Received on Friday, 23 November 2007 11:04:48 UTC