Re: Henny attending: 23 November 2007 Teleconference

Me too.

L.

Sylvie duchateau wrote:
> 
> I can be there too!
> Best
> Sylvie
> 
> 
> Swan, Henny a écrit :
>> I'll be there. Henny
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org] On 
>> Behalf Of Alan Chuter
>> Sent: 23 November 2007 10:48
>> To: EOWG
>> Subject: Regrets all round: 23 November 2007 Teleconference
>>
>> It would be useful to know who *does* intend to take part today. If
>> it's only Shawn and myself perhaps it would be better to cancel this
>> week.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Alan
>>
>>
>> On 23/11/2007, hbj@visinfo.dk <hbj@visinfo.dk> wrote:
>>> Thought I could make today's call. But can't after all
>>> Helle
>>>
>>> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
>>> Fra: w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org] På 
>>> vegne
>>> af Shawn Henry
>>> Sendt: 22. november 2007 05:52
>>> Til: EOWG (E-mail)
>>> Emne: EOWG: Agenda for 23 November 2007 Teleconference
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear EOWG Participants:
>>>
>>> An agenda and logistics for our 23 November 2007 teleconference follow.
>>>
>>> Time:    8:30am - 10:30am U.S. Eastern Time. For other time zones see:
>>>        http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html
>>> Bridge:  +1.617.761.6200 / +33.4.89.06.34.99 / +44.117.370.6152, 
>>> code: EOWG#
>>> (3694#)
>>> IRC:     Channel: #eo, server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665
>>>
>>> Scribe:  Henny (or Wayne or Andrew) (per
>>> www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/scribes.html)
>>>
>>> Agenda:
>>>
>>> 1. MWBP-WCAG Relationship
>>> * Requirements/Analysis: 
>>> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-mwbp-wcag
>>> * Latest version is linked from the top of the Requirements/Analysis
>>> An updated version may be sent to the list before the teleconference.
>>>
>>> Some areas for discussion:
>>> a. The MWBP to WCAG section now incorporates both WCAG 1.0 and 2.0. 
>>> They are
>>> in the same paragraph. Is that easy to understand with the "WCAG 1.0 
>>> /2.0"
>>> text in bold? Should WCAG 2.0 come first?
>>> b. The WCAG to MWBP section has two parts, first it runs through WCAG 
>>> 2.0
>>> and how the success criteria relate to MWBPs. Then another section 
>>> covers
>>> WCAG 1.0 and how the checkpoints relate to to the MWBPs. This makes 
>>> for a
>>> lot of redundant wording. Is this organization good because most 
>>> people will
>>> only want to read one section or the other? Other ideas for 
>>> organization?
>>> c. The cross references are often hyperlinks. This reduces redundancy 
>>> and
>>> facilitates maintenance, but makes the document at time difficult to 
>>> work
>>> with offline or on paper. To what extent should the document cite the 
>>> actual
>>> text of WCAG (especially the techniques) and the MWBPs?
>>> d. In the section "How does it help especially users with 
>>> disabilities?",
>>> the text runs "Best Practices that have no specific benefit for users 
>>> with
>>> disabilities beyond that experienced by the general user in the mobile
>>> context is marked [no added benefit]" Is that clear? Some people 
>>> apparently
>>> think it means that the MWBPs in question have no benefit for people 
>>> with
>>> disabilities, which is not the intention. Ideas for a better way to say
>>> this?
>>> e. Ideas for the section "3. How Barriers Experienced by Web Users with
>>> Disabilities Parallel those in the Mobile Context"?
>>>
>>> 2. Approach to WAI-ARIA Documents
>>> * http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-aria-docs
>>> A document that maps the content for the new documents may be sent to 
>>> the
>>> list before the teleconference.
>>>
>>> 3. WAI-ARIA FAQ
>>> * http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/ARIA/faq.html
>>> An updated version may be sent to the list before the teleconference.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> ~ Shawn
>>>
>>> ===
>>>
>>> NOTE: If you reply to this email, please change the subject line. If 
>>> you are
>>> sending regrets, add "Regrets" to the front of the current subject 
>>> line. If
>>> you are commenting on a document or topic, put the document title or 
>>> topic
>>> in the subject line. Thanks.
>>>
>>> IRC reminders and tips:
>>> - IRC is supplemental to the call. Some participants do not have IRC. 
>>> All
>>> substantive comments should be said verbally in the call (not just in 
>>> IRC).
>>> - To type a side comment that will _not_ get recorded in the minutes, 
>>> type
>>> /me comment - e.g.:
>>> /me hopes everyone had pleasant holidays
>>> will come out:
>>> *shawn hopes everyone had pleasant holidays
>>>
>>> Teleconference information:
>>> - Managing IRC for EOWG meeting minutes:
>>> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/template.html
>>> - W3C Zakim Teleconference Bridge: http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
>>> - Zakim IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot
>>> - A source for help with IRC (Internet Relay Chat): 
>>> http://www.irchelp.org/
>>>
>>> * Upcoming EOWG teleconference schedule: 
>>> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/#meetings
>>>
>>> ###

Received on Friday, 23 November 2007 11:19:19 UTC