Henny attending: 23 November 2007 Teleconference

I'll be there. Henny

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Alan Chuter
Sent: 23 November 2007 10:48
To: EOWG
Subject: Regrets all round: 23 November 2007 Teleconference

It would be useful to know who *does* intend to take part today. If
it's only Shawn and myself perhaps it would be better to cancel this
week.

regards,

Alan


On 23/11/2007, hbj@visinfo.dk <hbj@visinfo.dk> wrote:
>
> Thought I could make today's call. But can't after all
> Helle
>
> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> Fra: w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org] På vegne
> af Shawn Henry
> Sendt: 22. november 2007 05:52
> Til: EOWG (E-mail)
> Emne: EOWG: Agenda for 23 November 2007 Teleconference
>
>
> Dear EOWG Participants:
>
> An agenda and logistics for our 23 November 2007 teleconference follow.
>
> Time:    8:30am - 10:30am U.S. Eastern Time. For other time zones see:
>        http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html
> Bridge:  +1.617.761.6200 / +33.4.89.06.34.99 / +44.117.370.6152, code: EOWG#
> (3694#)
> IRC:     Channel: #eo, server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665
>
> Scribe:  Henny (or Wayne or Andrew) (per
> www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/scribes.html)
>
> Agenda:
>
> 1. MWBP-WCAG Relationship
> * Requirements/Analysis: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-mwbp-wcag
> * Latest version is linked from the top of the Requirements/Analysis
> An updated version may be sent to the list before the teleconference.
>
> Some areas for discussion:
> a. The MWBP to WCAG section now incorporates both WCAG 1.0 and 2.0. They are
> in the same paragraph. Is that easy to understand with the "WCAG 1.0 /2.0"
> text in bold? Should WCAG 2.0 come first?
> b. The WCAG to MWBP section has two parts, first it runs through WCAG 2.0
> and how the success criteria relate to MWBPs. Then another section covers
> WCAG 1.0 and how the checkpoints relate to to the MWBPs. This makes for a
> lot of redundant wording. Is this organization good because most people will
> only want to read one section or the other? Other ideas for organization?
> c. The cross references are often hyperlinks. This reduces redundancy and
> facilitates maintenance, but makes the document at time difficult to work
> with offline or on paper. To what extent should the document cite the actual
> text of WCAG (especially the techniques) and the MWBPs?
> d. In the section "How does it help especially users with disabilities?",
> the text runs "Best Practices that have no specific benefit for users with
> disabilities beyond that experienced by the general user in the mobile
> context is marked [no added benefit]" Is that clear? Some people apparently
> think it means that the MWBPs in question have no benefit for people with
> disabilities, which is not the intention. Ideas for a better way to say
> this?
> e. Ideas for the section "3. How Barriers Experienced by Web Users with
> Disabilities Parallel those in the Mobile Context"?
>
> 2. Approach to WAI-ARIA Documents
> * http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-aria-docs
> A document that maps the content for the new documents may be sent to the
> list before the teleconference.
>
> 3. WAI-ARIA FAQ
> * http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/ARIA/faq.html
> An updated version may be sent to the list before the teleconference.
>
> Regards,
> ~ Shawn
>
> ===
>
> NOTE: If you reply to this email, please change the subject line. If you are
> sending regrets, add "Regrets" to the front of the current subject line. If
> you are commenting on a document or topic, put the document title or topic
> in the subject line. Thanks.
>
> IRC reminders and tips:
> - IRC is supplemental to the call. Some participants do not have IRC. All
> substantive comments should be said verbally in the call (not just in IRC).
> - To type a side comment that will _not_ get recorded in the minutes, type
> /me comment - e.g.:
> /me hopes everyone had pleasant holidays
> will come out:
> *shawn hopes everyone had pleasant holidays
>
> Teleconference information:
> - Managing IRC for EOWG meeting minutes:
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/template.html
> - W3C Zakim Teleconference Bridge: http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
> - Zakim IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot
> - A source for help with IRC (Internet Relay Chat): http://www.irchelp.org/
>
> * Upcoming EOWG teleconference schedule: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/#meetings
>
> ###
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Email: achuter@technosite.es
Blogs
http://www.blogger.com/profile/09119760634682340619


-- 
DISCLAIMER:

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be privileged.  If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the 
content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the 
sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it 
and any attachments from your system.

RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by
its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants.  However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any  such which are transmitted.
We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and 
any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk



This message has been scanned for viruses by BlackSpider MailControl - www.blackspider.com

Received on Friday, 23 November 2007 10:56:36 UTC